5 Simple Techniques For case when law is silent
5 Simple Techniques For case when law is silent
Blog Article
Article 199 on the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other satisfactory remedy is provided by legislation." It really is perfectly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust offered remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether These remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
As a result of recent amendment, the court imposed a more severe sentence than would have been feasible under the previous Variation from the regulation.
four. It has been noticed by this Court that there is a delay of sooner or later in the registration of FIR which has not been explained with the complainant. Moreover, there is not any eye-witness on the alleged occurrence as well as the prosecution is counting on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession in the petitioners has long been tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of them namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram happened to get the real brothers from the deceased but they did not respond at all into the confessional statements of your petitioners and calmly noticed them leaving, 1 after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not search much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on fourteen.02.2018 and there is no explanation as to why her arrest was not effected after making with the alleged extra judicial confession. It has been held on numerous situations that extra judicial confession of the accused is often a weak variety of evidence which may be manoeuvred via the prosecution in any case where direct connecting evidence does not arrive their way. The prosecution can also be relying on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal did not say a word regarding presence of some light on the place, where they allegedly noticed the petitioners alongside one another with a motorcycle at four.
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” aren't binding, but might be used as persuasive authority, which is to give substance towards the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.
Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. 12. There is not any denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons owning their character over board, free from any moral stigma, are to generally be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is a condition precedent for appointment to your Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to your Government service may be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to try and do away with the candidature of the petitioner. Read more
Power to levy tax and also to legislate on immovable property together with tax on yearly rental value of immovable property after 18th Amendment(CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973)
seventy three . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Touching on the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 on the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice just isn't served, the grievance petition is usually dismissed. This is because service from here the grievance notice is often a mandatory prerequisite plus a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The law needs that a grievance notice be served over the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. In the event the employer fails to respond or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) When the organization is transprovincial.
The Court thought of the case to be maintainable under Article 184 (3) Because the Hazard and encroachment alleged were for example to violate the constitutional right to life when interpreted expansively.
In federal or multi-jurisdictional regulation systems there could exist conflicts between the assorted decrease appellate courts. Sometimes these differences will not be resolved, and it might be necessary to distinguish how the law is applied in a single district, province, division or appellate department.
In simple terms, the section states that any person who commits intentional murder shall be subjected to your death penalty or life imprisonment, along with a potential fine.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
To invoke section three hundred and 302 just because death has occurred is the most important tragedy of all. It does the precise opposite of what a legal system is there to perform, i.e. safe its citizens.
This landmark case expanded the fundamental rights to life and dignity by interpreting these rights to encompass the right into a healthy environment. This decision is particularly significant as there are no specific provisions while in the Pakistani Constitution regarding environmental protection. In relation to environmental law in Pakistan, it can be important that the case proven the application of your precautionary principle where there is really a danger to environmental rights, and emphasized the positive obligations with the State in protecting the right into a clean and healthy environment.
In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a 12-year aged boy from his home to protect him from the Terrible physical and sexual abuse he experienced endured in his home, and to prevent him from abusing other children in the home. The boy was placed within an emergency foster home, and was later shifted all-around within the foster care system.